Quantcast


Jul 02 2009

New Twitter Features: Reviewing from the Positive Side of the Brain (Revised)

Category: about me,social media,tech opinion,tech reviewsjmacofearth @ 2:04 pm

UPDATE 7-2-09: OKAY, so the preview content on the new friend or follower pages is GREAT. The implementation has a lot to be desired, but now using the new pages for a bit I can say that ONE THING is worth all the cr** I just gave @stop and company. I am always one to quickly admit my mistakes and correct anything I can. So let the record show that I rate the "preview" content of potential connections to be AWESOME. RATING 10 of 10. [All this other stuff should be addressed to, but hey, for JULY 2 and Fouth of July Weekend I declare the Twitter Upgrades a WIN!]

A dear friend and Twitter marketer, contacted me late last night to voice concerns about my negative tone. I thought I had already had that conversation, but he probably doesn't "read me." No worries. So one of the pieces he pointed to was my recent trashing of the UX/UI changes on Twitter. I DID ping @stop and ask if he was the Creative Director responsible for the NEW TWITTER Friends and Followers pages. Here's what he said.

Picture 38

Okay, so perhaps I was being mean, I don't sense that was my purpose, but I do understand online sarcasm and humor can often be confused for bitterness, anger, vendetta, whateva…

So here goes my ALL GOOD review… Let's see how this rolls.

+++

THE ALL GOOD REVIEW: Thank goodness Twitter has made some needed upgrades to their UX.

So Twitter's got a new pull-down action menu for dispatching some useful tasks.

Picture 14

Here we can see the new pull-down menu for taking action on followers and followees.

With a simple click we can @, DM, Follow or Block any one. And this nifty feature is now available in the same flavor across all the "friends" or "followers" pages you visit. Even when looking at the "friends" or "followers" of other users. Nice!

And convenient that you can see instantly, even without using the drop-down, that this person is "blocked" or "followed." [Oh heck, am I still following that silly old advertising agency that I used to work for. Let's see, CLICK: drop-down, PULL: Unfollow.]

Nice! So now let's look at the new and improved Followers and Friends pages.

Here is a shot of the "You Follow" page in LIST view.

Picture 16

So this pretty much looks like the old "You Follow" page. And conveniently the same drop-down box is available here too. [I wish we could choose the number of tweeps to view per page, cause following 5,600 tweeps using 20 tweeps per page... well that's 280 pages of goodness I have to page through to edit and cull my list. Just a thought.]

And here's the greatly improved "Your Followers" page in EXPANDED view:

Picture 39

Here we can see that @stop and company have added a little contextual information with each tweep. So you can see the person's last tweet, very helpful when deciding if you want to reciprocally follow back.

And again the nice BIG pull-down button. And also a handy, ADD button.

So there are just a few things missing from the new interface. I'm sure @stop and his group are already hard at work on the next iteration.

Picture 40

1. I would like to see a RT option here. This must have been an oversight, cause that's such a simple fix.

2. I would also really like Twitter to add a "-!" Report Abusive Account feature. Where I can fast-track pornsters and scammers to the dustbin of Twitter Hades.

And in the Usability department, here's one more suggestion.

Picture 41

Picture 42

Maybe there would be a good case for a drop-down something like this:

View By List
- 20 per page (default)
- 50 per page (efficient)
- 100 per page (uber user)

And for ultra.uber powerusers, there could be a TEXT LIST mode, with no pics. [That would be really fast, and I bet could relieve some of the server load on Twitter's cloud.]

Carry on @stop and company. Good work and if you need any further advice, feel free to ask. It's what I do, too.

Cheers,

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/twitter-good

The harsh-toned review from last night: Twitter UX Awakens: The NEW TWITTER Reviewed and Dissected for UX and

And my collection of Twitter Posts all in one place: The Twitter Way

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Jun 30 2009

Twitter UX Awakens: The NEW TWITTER Reviewed and Dissected for UX and UI

Category: social mediajmacofearth @ 8:16 pm

Picture 13Ah the revolution has begun. Twitter is getting off their heels and coming to the table with a new feature set in the form of a UI upgrade. And the "social" media (Mashable claims BREAKING) is all over it. Well, let's have a quick looksee. [I have to think smartman Cashmore is amused to be poking the BREAKING stick at Twitter. Is it a foreshadowing? Does Pete like the changes? Does Pete think Twitter BROKE Twitter? Lionsandtigersandbearsohmy!]

I did notice today, as I was going about my tweeting business, I could not get any one's "Follows" page to come up. I just thought it was TwitterFail wonkiness. And low and behold it WAS TwitterFail wonkiness, but with a purpose this time. To launch a new UI for the Followers and Friends pages. All hail the effort.

I did take a moment to visit Mr. Cashmore's BREAKING NEWS and post this comment regarding the BIG NEWS.

And how about letting us decide how many follower(ees) to show per page? Managing tweeps by the handful (20 per page) is dumb and hard. This is an improvement. But I'd settle for less fail whale and more users per page, thank you very much.

So there, even before I've begun I have exposed my hand. I am not sooooo happy with the changes. While they are nice, and many will herald "revolutionary" and "amazing," I am not so convinced that just giving us the ability to affect more followers per page wouldn't have been a better UPGRADE. But enough about my gripes.

So here's a look at how the NEW TWITTER handles porn spam and bad advertising agencies.

Picture 14

So there's the picture of the pretty girl, super00009 and I can see from the info on the new page that she has been blocked. And if I click on the gear I get several drop-down options. I can @ her, DM her, Follow her or Unblock her. Okay, already I see a problem. So the other iconographic button is a PLUS sign and a silhouette. I think that would be FOLLOW. And the "Unblock?" that would probably be Unblock. SO… Why are they repeated again in the drop down? UX 101, you do not need to have repetitive controls in multiple places. Put them in the menu, or as buttons, but not both. In fact, TWITTER UX GURU, How about this

1. BLOCK/UNBLOCK Toggle button.

2. FOLLOW/UNFOLLOW toggle button and

3. GEAR for MORE options.

Or, you have plenty of white space there. If you're gonna do buttons, then do buttons. So

3. @ button for sending a message "about" someone

4. DM button for sending a direct message

5. RT button [uh, herrro, Twitter? Anyone in there? Where's the RT functionality? Okay, I admit I get irritated by bad design. Mainly when I'm forced to use it over and over and over again.]

6. (I'm giving you this one for FREE) a "!" Report button that alerts the Twitter police that super00009 is a pornster using Twitter for soliciting my attention and perhaps money. [I am immune to her charms, btw.]

There, see how easy that was? No muss no fuss, no need for a generic pull-down gear button. And each action takes only ONE CLICK. [Don't you guys have any design people on staff to come up with something a bit more original?]

Perhaps I am being harsh again. But, Twitter is used by millions. Twitter is a force. Don't you think they could get some SERIOUS help on this UX/UI thing?

Okay, so let's get to the overall picture again. The page change IS pretty dramatic.

Here is the expanded view:

Picture 17

Okay, wait… Where did the blocked "unblock?" thing go? And the ADD button?

Alright I figured it out.

Here's a deeper picture of that same "expanded page."

Picture 19

So, let's see what's happened here.

If you are following someone the Follow Button is gone. [This is why a toggled FOLLOW/UNFOLLOW would work beautifully.]

But wait, something is different… Oh, I see. This is the FOLLOWERS page, and these are folks who may or may not be following me. The top page is the FOLLOWING page, so I am already following those folks. So now the UX/UI person created a big UI fail: Control buttons appearing and disappearing. Why not make the set of controls the same for every page. See how nicely  Tweetdeck has a cluster of controls to manage the tweetstream functionality.

Picture 23

But we can't really just copy Tweetdeck now can we? But at least the UX/UI team at Twitter should frackin LOOK AT TWEETDECK as an example. They would've seen the RT button and somebody would'a, could'a, should'a said, "Holy cow Bob, we forgot ReTweet. We forgot to put in RT as a function. Oh damn, you've already pushed it live. Oh well."

So let's look at the LIST version of the FOLLOWING page.

Picture 16

Boy, it's apparent to me more than ever, and I'd have said to the UX/UI guy, "Holy Cow Bob, those are damn big buttons! Do you think the buttons' need to be so darned BIG?"

So the LIST view would be a great place for the LIST button to be a pulldown and have something like

View By List
- 20 per page (default)
- 50 per page (efficient)
- 100 per page (uber user)
- 1,000,000 per page (mr. demi moore only)

But perhaps that would put too big a load on the servers. How about LIST w/o pictures or buttons? Say a TEXT view? Now that would be fast and save us some extra clicks as well. So just when they were at a point where they could've made a really dramatic improvement in User Experience, they pulled back and went with User Interface alone.

So the buttons don't need to be nearly that big, unless the new Twitter demographic is trending towards octogenarians. And if your gonna do buttons then do buttons, but don't mix buttons with text links with pulldowns. It's irritating. [And I was happy before I started writing this review. I guess I will get over it pretty quick to, what with all this venting.]

If you can't say something nice… Okay, here's the WIN behind the NEW IMPROVED TWITTER: In the EXPANDED view I can see the person's last tweet. AND, I get that same EXPANDED or LIST view for everyone I check out. So while I'm not so big on the execution of the new feature set at least it is something. But that dang super00009 is still there. And even after I block her, she is still there haunting me. [Kinda like the real bad advertising agency that follows her every where she goes.]

And the BLOCK screen has much to be desired.

Picture 25

So there she is, another of super00009's aliases, mtraveKittyi! Why the grave concern with me BLOCKING her? Just make BLOCKING with the same REAL WORLD consequences as UNFOLLOWING. Imagine an UNFOLLOW screen saying:

Are you sure you want to unfollow super00009?
- You're gonna miss all super00009's funny/sexy/cute tweets and calls for your attention
- You won't show up in super00009's updates any more [or be counted as one of her pawns!!!]
- super00009 won't broadcast her trash into your tweepstream any more

I would like a way to let Twitter know that I have unfollowed super00009 with a prejudice and believe that she is probably not a 20 yo sex kitten who wants my children.

So there you have it. My somewhat irritated take on the NEW IMPROVED TWITTER.

RATING: 6 out of 10. [Needs improvement.]

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/new-twitter

You may prefer my alternatively toned POSITIVE REVIEW HERE: New Twitter Features: Reviewing from the Positive Side of the Brain

Question: Does it surprise anyone that only 10% of Twitter's server traffic is due to Twitter.com interactions? Why? Because everyone else is using an APP to manage what Twitter can't. If Twitter.com is the 10% solution, then why do we need Twitter.com at all? Give me TWAVE.com or TWITTEROPEN.ORG and I will port my data and settings without shedding a tear for Biz or EV or the Fail Whale Follies.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Jun 25 2009

Blocking and Tackling On Twitter: I Guess It Could Be Worse

Category: tech opinion,tech reviews,toolsjmacofearth @ 7:01 am

Picture 3

So it's easy as pie to follow or unfollow someone. One click on the old tweet page will do it. (I would argue Twitter needs to give us more than 20 tweeps per page, but for what we have now, it's not too bad.)

But then we have BLOCKING.

Here are three cuties, that I'm sure have nothing but the best intentions in following me… BUT. In an effort to provide value to my followers I have been checking downstream in those that follow me as well as who I follow to make sure I am deleting the scammers and pornsters.

So this trio of goodness arrived yesterday and instead of the nice big follow button, I have the "block" link. And when I click it, I get an intermediary screen like this:

Picture 4

Which is not a terrible thing, but it makes the process of BLOCKING require two to three times as many steps.

I can click to follow. CLICK. I can click to UNFOLLOW. CLICK. But in order to get rid of my hangers-on, I have to

1st CLICK > Block.

2nd Click "Okay, I still want to block this person"

and sometimes it doesn't take, and I have to do the whole thing again.

Why all this seriousness about BLOCKING?

So I propose that TWITTER make BLOCK as simple as FOLLOW or UNFOLLOW. Cause the riff raff out there is only going to get more intense and the value of the tweet is going to be that much harder to explain.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://uber.la/archives/3673

Some related Twitter Postings and Position Statements:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


May 13 2009

Twitter's #@!# Whale! Call It a "Small Settings Update" But I Call It MAJOR FAIL

Category: social media,tech opinion,tools,trust & reputationjmacofearth @ 8:04 am
unfollow BIZ

unfollow BIZ

[Update 11:00 am CST - Biz Responds at end of post]

So now comes before the twitterverse the honorable yet questionable Biz Stone on the Twitter Blog!

Small Settings Update (They are kidding Right?)

We've updated the Notices section of Settings to better reflect how folks are using Twitter regarding replies. Based on usage patterns and feedback, we've learned most people want to see when someone they follow replies to another person they follow—it's a good way to stay in the loop. However, receiving one-sided fragments via replies sent to folks you don't follow in your timeline is undesirable. Today's update removes this undesirable and confusing option.

So effective immediately is you will no longer see your friends @ replies to folks you don't follow.

Holy FAIL WHALE! This is absolutely the primary way I find new people to follow. Discovery on Twitter is part of the Magic.

Let's review DM biz (nobody but Biz sees) // @ replies @biz (everybody sees) // so what about RT's let's see, perhaps a minor update removing the RT feature all together. Or perhaps RT will only show up if you follow both the Tweeter and the Original Tweeter. UG!

Here is what they have to say about that in the same post:

The Importance of Discovery

"Spotting new folks in tweets is an interesting way to check out new profiles and find new people to follow. Despite this update, you'll still see mentions or references linking to people you don't follow. For example, you'll continue to see, "Ev meeting with @biz about work stuff" even if you don't follow @biz. We'll be introducing better ways to discover and follow interesting accounts as we release more features in this space." Or maybe delete features that were working fine without really thinking of the impact of something that seems so "SMALL!"

Oh, okay, trust the company that can't keep their servers up to release more features that will fill this void they are creating. Oh, let me guess, the "paid Twitter account" can control all kinds of cool functions. Like seeing all of the @ replies!

So folks, here is a tipping point. Twitter has removed a feature, "Based on usage patterns and feedback" that was far and away the most useful discovery process I had. Follow someone interesting and see who they are tweeting with. It's easy enough to click on the @-ed person's profile to see what the rest of the conversation is about. But now you CAN'T.

The spermy blast of the #@!# Whale blows hard today.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/wtf-whale

homer the new fail whale by edwheeler Twitters #@!# Whale! Call It a Small Settings Update But I Call It MAJOR FAIL

[Update from BIZ WED 13, 11AM CST]

Whoa, Feedback!

We're getting a ton of extremely useful feedback about yesterday's update to Settings. The engineering team reminded me that there were serious technical reasons why that setting had to go or be entirely rebuilt—it wouldn't have lasted long even if we thought it was the best thing ever. Nevertheless, it's amazing to wake up and see all the tweets about this change.

We're hearing your feedback and reading through it all. One of the strongest signals is that folks were using this setting to discover and follow new and interesting accounts—this is something we absolutely want to support. Our product, design, user experience, and technical teams [the teams that deleted this feature in the first place] have started brainstorming a way to surface a new, scalable way to address this need. [Oh boy, stay tuned. Do they really have a UX and Design team? What are they desiging, the update for the Fail Whale? Those cute little "somethings wrong" graphics?]

Please stay tuned and thank you again for all the feedback.

- Biz

A few related posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,




social media innovation group

future posts

A Collaborative Space: WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, Skype, Basecamp (Teaming/Meeting Tools)
Twitter Problem: How do you find enough interesting people to follow? Then how do you keep up with them?
The Agile Mind: Construction, Evolution, Care, and Feeding Instructions for Mental Flexibility

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogged Blog Directory

Austin Interactive Marketing Association

jmacofearth's socialmedia dashboard via AllTop

99, near perfect hubspot ranking