Quantcast


Mar 03 2010

Why Google BUZZ Does NOT Matter: 3 Reasons to "Turn Off Buzz."

Category: lifestreaming, social media, speed the web, tech opinion, tech reviews, toolsjmacofearth @ 10:57 am

image: google buzz inside G-Mail - what's the value?

[3-4-10: It's been 20 days since I looked in my Google Buzz folder. Am I missing something? What? Now, if you want to jump on a WAVE with me, I'm all fingers and toes.]

How Even the Mighty Google Fails Sometimes. Maybe you can call me Anti-Buzz, or Buzz-Kill, but I am not excited about Buzz at all. Here's why:

Can you tell me one thing Buzz does BETTER than the other tools available? We talked about it at a company dinner last night (and these are smart social media-y kinda folks) and nobody could say why BUZZ was even interesting. Three points of interest might be:

1. Google-always-does-killer-apps? Nah. 2. Plugs into G-mail? Not that interesting. 3. Has a fantastic mobile app? Er… No. I can't wait until the first person asks me, "Did you get my Buzz?" I savor the moment.

So what if these are the struggling throws of a fumbling giant? Google! So strong, so innovative, launching all these pet projects that have no integration and no coherence with one another. How does WAVE tie to Buzz. How does Orkut or Jaiku or Google Profile for that matter, have ANY connection or benefit from a BUZZ link?

Okay, so if I sound frustrated, it's because I am. Buzz is a big miss! We are spending valuable resources and time trying to figure out why we need another tool that really doesn't do much beyond the tools we have.

At Dell, the story goes, when Michael Dell looked at the prototypes of Dell's 2008 entry into the MP3 player market, he asked, "What does it do that the iPod doesn't?"

I think the Google developers need to ask themselves the same question. "How does this tool/project/platform/service provide something that does not exist? Or at the very least, "How does this product kick butt over the other products available?"

When the answer comes up "I dunno!" Perhaps even mighty Google should pause and ask, "Is this product going to move the Google Brand, the Google Application Suite, forward?"

As the Goo-Giant lumbers forward, even BING is getting some love because we kinda want Microsoft to return to some sense of sanity. I mean many of us depend on Windows products to make a living.

Score some HUGE wins for Google: Voice, Sync, Apps, Chrome (browser), Android.

Score some BONERS for Google: WAVE, Buzz, Orkut.

And a few TBD for Google: Caffeine, Real-time search integration, Twitter indexing.

So I'd like to see Google did what Apple did for their Snow Leopard update to OS X. No new features only FASTER, MORE STABLE, and REFINEMENTS. Imagine.

Here's how my G-mail tab looks now that I've killed Buzz.

Screen shot 2010 02 11 at 6.30.29 PM Why Google BUZZ Does NOT Matter: 3 Reasons to Turn Off Buzz.

And here's the link I clicked to kill it: "turn off buzz" will be a trending topic more than "turn on buzz" as shown below.

Screen shot 2010 02 11 at 6.31.36 PM Why Google BUZZ Does NOT Matter: 3 Reasons to Turn Off Buzz.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/why-buzz

Product Review News: Looks into Buzz for a Clue

Yesterday's Anti-Buzz Rant from Uber.la: What's the BUZZ Tell Me What's Happening with Facebook vs Google Buzz?

Update and push back from some: Why Google Buzz is Brilliant by Christopher S. Penn.

google buzz with chris brogan and christopher s penn

And my response:

Okay, I'll be happy to disagree with this one Chris. It's not that I don't like where you are going with your post here, but I think the process of "pruning back hard" is important on Facebook and Twitter and not just a part of adding yourself (or not adding yourself) to the buzz. You are spot on about the clatter and churn washing up within social networks. Even LinkedIN is getting kind of spammy, don't you think? So what are we to do? Join the Buzz-wagon?

I think what we must do, on whatever networks we happen to be fond of, is cut back against the spammers. Box off the trolls. Delete the snipers. Use apps like Disqus to silence the cr*p that makes it across all of our blogs today as "conversation."

There are awesome tools to help you cull your spammers on Twitter. I am sure there will be similar apps for Facebook and perhaps Buzz. But the problem is not solved by adding a new app, the problem is solved by behaving in a new way. By building better habits, purging our "followers" and not just the ones we follow we get more REAL with the social part of the networking.

I love seeing the picture above of you guys. See Brogan is a workin Geek like the rest of us. Sometimes his writing is so damn good, and his approach is so damn real, I forget he's just sittin at the table trying to do better like the rest of us. Rock On CB! And Rock on CSP!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Jan 04 2010

CES Day One: Apple BUYS Twitter and Shows their Tablet Computer, the iSlate iPad

Category: iPad-iWay!, just for fun, social media, tech opinionjmacofearth @ 10:40 pm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Monday Jan. 4, 2010, Las Vegas
Following directly on the surprise release of the Apple iSlate iPad on opening day at CES 2010 in Las Vegas, Apple and Twitter announced Apple's purchase of Twitter for 2 billion dollars in cash and stock. Jobs says they will phase out all non-Mac OS apps and access to the popular microblogging service. "We liked Twitter from the beginning. And we think people will like it more on a Mac so in 2011 we will begin phasing out all access to machines running non-Apple OS services."

When Microsoft spokesman at CES, Haywood J Blow, was asked about Apple's daring move he said, "When the corporate customer starts asking for Twitter, we will buy or invent something like Twitter. Apple has not won this war yet." Shares of MSFT, DELL, HP all fell sharply in after-hours trading.

Tweetdeck and Seesmic announced their immediate support of the move saying it would reduce their development costs and give the end-user a more mac-like experience. Google had no immediate comment but shareholders voted to up their purchase of Apple stock by 20% a year. And a new version of Mac-only Google WAVE was also rumored to be only a few months down the roadmap.

Asked for a comment, the creator or Tweetdeck Iain Dodsworth said, "I'm a Mac. And all of our developers are on Mac's so why wouldn't we be the first open Twitter client to close down other platforms? By the end of 2010, if Windows is still the dominant computing platform, I'll start using Seesmic and Hootesuite. Seriously!"

Michael Dell was contacted via his iPhone after the announcement, but offered no comment. He did update his Twitter status with this "Oh, that's funny. I think that guy's been writing about Dell for over a year now, ever since he left." Bill Gates' iPhone was forwarding calls to his Google Voice account.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/apple-CES

Even before the announcement Apple's new ad campaign was plastered across the CES walls today read, "Of course, tweeting is Better on a Mac."

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Nov 30 2009

SideWiki, WAVE and the Future of the Web; Is Google a Trusted Partner?

Category: community building, lifestreaming, social media, tech opinionjmacofearth @ 1:43 pm

If you missed SideWiki like I have it might be, like me, you don't use the Google Toolbar in your browser. Well, thanks to buddy Michael Brito who published this link to is self-sidewikied entry to is own facebook page, I am now a SWiki-er. I've been a wiki fan for a while, but this takes things to a new level of content tagging and yet another disruptive technology from Google.

Google's SideWiki in Action

So as we are moving forward we can tag, comment and post content about the page that we are viewing. This in and of itself is not new, but that Google has added this function rather than some "untrusted" third party. [I imagine your groans, but pause for a second. If you think Google doesn't already have all the information on you to make a VERY LARGE file, then you probably delete your cookies each time you quit FF. I have resigned myself to using Google Analytics, with Info Sharing turned on, Google Voice, iGoogle as my RSS reader of choice. Anyway, to me, Google already has the links on me so adding more info to my file is not a concern of mine. The "toolbar" on the other hand takes up a lot of screen real estate and I'm not a fan of toolbars, regardless of how innovative and useful they are.]

Here are a few questions I have about SideWiki and how we, the browsing public [not the browsing marketers], might use SideWiki to enrich our browsing experience. So for now, I have the Google Toolbar enabled [wondering if there is a different SideWiki option] and I will add a few SideWiki entries as I go around. But I bet ya, within 24 hours I've hidden the Google Toolbar again and SideWiki will fall to the bottom of my internet toolbox. Until I NEED it.

[Kinda like Google WAVE, IMHO, it will be neat when I NEED it. Right now I don't need it. I don't even really understand it, but I'm sure I will at some point.]

So are you SideWiki savvy? If not, you might get on and check it out. Even if it's just to imagine how Google might use SideWiki content to influence search results. Go figure!

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/sidewiki-g

Kudos to britopian for his new gig:

britopian, michael brito

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,




WCG - this healthcare team rocks the web

socialmedianinja-x180

social media innovation group

future posts

The Lifetime Value of a "Connection" - Business is One Thing, Deep Friendship Another Thing Entirely
Dell's Amazing Twitter Success: Were We Pawned Into An Illusion of the Commercial Potential of Twitter?
"We Googled You" : What You'd Better Know About Your SERP on Google

Add to Technorati Favorites

Austin Interactive Media Association

meterthis! momentum logo

Alltop for Social Media

Grader score for uber.la!

The NEW Twindle

trillion-joker-badge

Blogged Blog Directory