Quantcast


Sep 01 2010

Rockstars vs. Heros: A Manager Can Make the Difference

rockstar building, not hero buildingBack in the day, I was part of an agressive startup company. We were working some folks too hard. While I was allowing some of them to work from home occasionally, the load was still pressing most of them into 60 hour weeks. As I was having a 1 x 1 with one of my team, I was talking about the rockstar mentality vs the hero mentality.

Here's a paraphrase: "It is my job to make rockstars not heros. I am like a strong support team. I will get you food if you have to work late. I will give you time off if you have to work weekends. I will help shift some other projects and prioritize your load so WE can succeed.

"What I am not into is creating heros. Heros are people who take the arrows for others; people who sacrifice their lifestyles to make the job work. These people end up feeling resentful, angry, and uncared for. It is my job, as a team leader, to identify the "hero" situations and try and turn them into "rockstar" situations."

Turns out, at that job I was working for a pretty supportive leader. He too was good at recognizing the difference between the two overachiever types and allowing me the flexibility to reward the rockstars and manage the heros. The problem was the fact that I was replacing an enabler. The manager who I had been hired to replace was somewhat of a mother hen. And the problem was, she was a hero. And being such she created even more heros on her team.

So when the heros were coming to me, a month into my new position, bent out of shape by how they had been treated or compensated or whatever, I was already at a disadvantage. I was NOT on IM at 10pm every night, "like they were." I did NOT work every weekend to catch up, "like they did." Or like the previous manager had.

Later in my career a manager/mentor taught me the saying, "It's not my fire."

I was just about to freak out and try hero mode on her, but she stood firm. "I'm going into this meeting. And then I have another meeting after that. If you still want to talk after lunch, I will talk with you about this, but I have other priorities at this moment."

Oh, I thought. And later I began to understand how that statement worked. I had to push back on the "fire-starter" and say, I will have to get back to you on this issue. And while the issue seemed URGENT to me and this other person, my manager had given me the power to hit the pause button.

This creates two opportunities for the fire-starter. 1. They can take a breath and regroup and wait for you to get back to them. OR 2. They can go around you.

In the case of the fire I was trying to put out, the person tried going around me while waiting for me to get back to them. And what ended up happening, was the person who was actually responsible for causing the hold up that was causing the fire, had to answer for the problem. By the time my manager and I reviewed the situation, the email flurry had died down, and the fire-starter had taken the issue back upon themselves. Where it belonged in the first place.

So I could've been a hero and spun my wheels and worked like a mad man for the entire morning to solve the problem. OR I could listen to reason, "You didn't create this problem and you alone cannot solve it." and get on with some of the things in my priority list that I could actually do something about.

Lesson learned: try to empower your team to become rockstars when necessary. If they are reporting in as heros, you might need to look at your own management style, and determine if you are enabling them to become fire-starters or hero-ic.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/rockstar_hero

additional leadership posts:

see also the Leadership tab

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Sep 03 2009

Creating Passionate Teams – Managers Hold the Spark

Category: career,executive learnings,teaming & leadershipjmacofearth @ 7:00 am

"More than anything else talented people want to be in environments that both appreciate
and cultivate their talents."
Scott Berkun

Collecting two key thoughts about teams and empowered project management. These two folks have changed my entire perspective on teams and management and passionate leadership. Even when we are not "managing" anyone, we are all project managing each other in our work. We manage up to get what we need from the executive leadership. And we cooperate across disciplines and business silos.

“What do you need from me in order to kick ass on this project?” — Kathy Siearra, Creating Passionate Users

From Scott Berkun: How to Manage Smart People …managers have many undocumented, unsaid,
but incredibly important, functions. They have more to do with enabling the happiness and productivity of the people that work for them than anyone else in the organization.

…he created an environment where good ideas rose to the top, further encouraging smart people to
want to contribute. The bossman made working for him feel like a proper relationship:
he got something from us, and we got something from him. I think that this kind of management
style requires more skill and savvy than a more hierarchical drill sergeant type of
manager.

More than anything else talented people want to be in environments that both appreciate
and cultivate their talents.
Any successful manager of talented people has to come in
every day, in every meeting, and directly work towards making this happen. This doesn’t
mean coddling people, or denying the team’s goals in favor of making someone feel
good. Instead it’s about making actions and decisions that both clarify how people’s
talents apply to the team goals, and working to keep the team happy, motivated, and
focused in that application.

One practical way to overcome this [lack openness] starts with a meeting. The manager sets up a meeting
with the employee and opens a discussion about how they like to be managed. The manager
should explain the purpose of the meeting, and asking clarifying questions about what
the other person says. Generally, the manager should say little about their own opinions.
Zero. Zilch. Zip. Instead, their job is to listen, help clarify the other persons thoughts
and then go away and think about what they said.

First acknowledge that you have weaknesses, both in skills and in knowledge. Second, admit that you’re ignorance hurts not only the product or website, but the team itself. Third, get help in hiring experts for roles you are not familiar with, and go out of your way to involve them, and their perspective, in
your decision making process. Deliberately hire first rate strong willed people to represent
disciplines that you tend to undervalue. Force yourself to be on the top of your own
game, and to make sure it’s not bias and ignorance that drive you, but good judgment
refined by divergent perspectives.

references
Kathy Sierra: BrainDeath by Micromanagement
Scott Berkun: How to Manage Smart People

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/team-leadership

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,




social media innovation group

future posts

A Collaborative Space: WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, Skype, Basecamp (Teaming/Meeting Tools)
Twitter Problem: How do you find enough interesting people to follow? Then how do you keep up with them?
The Agile Mind: Construction, Evolution, Care, and Feeding Instructions for Mental Flexibility

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogged Blog Directory

Austin Interactive Marketing Association

jmacofearth's socialmedia dashboard via AllTop

99, near perfect hubspot ranking