Quantcast



Jan 11 2010

LinkedIN Gets Social: Is it Viral or CRAP? You Decide.

Category: community building,social media,tech opinionjmacofearth @ 6:31 pm

linkedin goes viral, viral linkedin discussion, kevin conway, boston emarketingI hear it again and again, don't go negative. But dang*t, it's hard not to sometimes. Sometimes…

Well, sometimes I let the heat of the emotion get the best of me. And I fire back where ignorant comments are hurled at people entering a discussion with a different point of view than the "author" of the discussion.

Thus is the case with the first Viral Flamewars post in the history of LinkedIn. Nearing 2,000 comments, a self-styled "SEO expert" and "social media marketing expert" Kevin Conway, not the NASCAR driver mind you, has ignited hearts and minds with a call to arms.

Social Media for Business is CRAP! (thread was deleted)

Mr. C has now launched a new discussion group on LinkedIN called, you guessed it, "Social Media for Business is CRAP."

image: social media is crap, linkedIN goes viral, robert henslee

I have become a primary antagonist, not really on purpose, but I have to say I take some joy in seeing these boys wrap themselves around their statements, attack newbies, and now focus their mis-guided rants at me. They definitely needed a target. I am happy to play along.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/linkedin-viral

POV: Sometimes social media needs an antagonist. I am often happy to slip into that role:

An antagonist (from Greek ἀνταγωνιστήςantagonistes, "opponent, competitor, rival"[1]) is a character, group of characters, or an institution, who represents the opposition against which the protagonist(s) must contend. In other words, 'A person, or a group of people who oppose the main character, or the main characters.'[2] In the classic style of story wherein the action consists of a hero fighting a villain, the two can be regarded as protagonist and antagonist, respectively.[3]

[As a response to some of the comments here, and more so the comments I got as part of the LinkedIN viral discussion, I have launched a NING community site to rally around the best ways to deal with TROLLS who attack. And more importantly the Trolls who threaten. Please join us at Social Media is Not Hate (Ning) You might be member #2!]

The whole post thread. Watch for Trolls along the path, cause they are hoppin mad today!

Nice Shot – How long's it been since you've seen the Matrix?
Social Media Proves Successful as ROI for Business, LinkedIN Group Flames On
Challenge ROI, Challenge the Model, but Social Media Means Real Business
Social Media Being Challenged: CRAP? For Business? Really?
A Bit 'o Humor at the Experts Expense: The SEO Expert said to the SM Expert
The Red Badge of Courage: Haiti Needs Everyone's Help (JAN 19-10 update 5)
My MLK Manifesto 2010: I have a dream… I wish social media could be used to…
A Pirate's Life for Meeeee: Now about this Duck Song Thing? (Waddle Waddle Waddle)
Crazy Little Thing Called Love: If You Can't Say Something Nice… Well, Shout It
Drawing the Circles Around LinkedIN Contacts – Social Media for Business of Any Size
Does LinkedIN Create Business via Social Media Networking?
LinkedIN Gets Social: Is it Viral or CRAP? You Decide.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Jan 09 2010

Disruptive Innovation in a Single Character: If the * Came to the URL (a social media stimulus plan)

So what would turn the online world upside down in a fundamental way, be very simple and a cause a flurry of business and prospecting, goldmining and domain squatting?

Imagine if we were allowed to add a new non-alpha character to domain names. (You think the .me or .tv spaces got heated up?) So what if, starting in July 4, 2010, the powers that be at the domain services servers determined that we could start buying domains with * asterisks added within them? (Suspend for a moment the objection that the * is a programming symbol and would never be allowed as part of a domain name.)

So on day one, second one, I register about 1,000 *-enabled domains. (*nike.com, *coke.com, *dell.com, *microsoft.com) While those domains would eventually be legally transferred back to the rightful brands, domain squatting is not legal, many new domains would be legal and unique and immediately valuable. (*socialmedia.com, even social*media.com) The sports industry, porn idustry, branding and entertainment industries would have a nearly infinite number of new domain possibilities.

So the asterisk is probably not coming to a domain name near you anytime soon. We can still use "-" and "." in some circumstances, but a totally new character could generate millions in new revenue for the domain hosting companies, the design and branding companies who would come up with and design new brands and visual identities around the new use of the * symbol. I think it's a good idea.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/bs-socialmedia

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Next Page »


social media innovation group

future posts

A Collaborative Space: WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, Skype, Basecamp (Teaming/Meeting Tools)
Twitter Problem: How do you find enough interesting people to follow? Then how do you keep up with them?
The Agile Mind: Construction, Evolution, Care, and Feeding Instructions for Mental Flexibility

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogged Blog Directory

Austin Interactive Marketing Association

jmacofearth's socialmedia dashboard via AllTop

99, near perfect hubspot ranking