Quantcast


Aug 15 2010

How Do I: Make Each Blog Post Count Towards Victory (20 Blogging Tips)

top 20 blogger tipsHere are 20 tips that I take for granted every time I write a post. But so many people don't do them, that I figgered I'd put it out there.

  1. Always add "related posts" section to the end of your post. Because many of your visitors (about 80% in my case) will be first timers. And you want them to at least read one extra post if you can keep them.
  2. Use bit.ly or some other statistics registering URL shortener to create a permalink to your post. You can use keywords in the link. It's bound to help a leetle bit.
  3. Always use your Twitter ID as your signature. How do you think I got to 6k followers? It wasn't my good looks. I use my Twitter ID as my "follow me" link. And I ask for it on every one.
  4. Make your tags fun. Sure tags are for navigation and seo. But can't they also be for fun. (aka: stupid tag tricks)
  5. If you start expanding your post to a second point, or a larger topic, stop, edit and post. I like writing long posts. I think the long form is underrated. (Perhaps Seth Godin is to blame.) But the worst thing you can do is confuse your reader by meandering or going on to a second point when an exclamation point at the end of your first point would do.
  6. Write with flare. As Seth says in Tribes, "No body forwards a boring post." Rant, rave, fume, joke, cajole, but don't be boring.
  7. Be aware of SEO-rich terms. Always be aware of SEO. If google can find you, others can too.
  8. Submit an XML sitemap each time you put up a new post. Again, you want Google to find you. Again and again.
  9. Make a note of your most popular posts. And rewrite them or update them. Or write a related post. But if you don't know what your most popular posts are, you are missing a huge opportunity.
  10. Make a note of your traffic patterns. Are most of your visitors coming from your Twitter mention? Are they finding you via Google or an embeded link? Are they reading more than one post? What's your bounce rate?
  11. Always tag your images. About 10% of my traffic finds my sight due to my tagged images. You never know when someone might be looking for a picture of the new Camero. If you've tagged your photo creatively and accurately. You might get found in the next 1,000 "2010 Camero" searches.
  12. Organize your posts. If all of your posts are temporary then no one will read beyond today's news. I use a combination of Pages and Categories (that I use as a subject navigation tree) If you don't make your own "best of" pages, no one else will.
  13. Don't be afraid to retweet a good post. As a rule I try not to tweet a single post more than three times. (I fail sometimes out of enthusiasm.) Remember Twitter is very temporary. It is most likely someone will either be ON and see your tweet or they will miss it. That's why the most action on a tweet is within two minutes of the link. And if your readers are in different time zones, don't forget to tweet during their peak times.
  14. A picture is worth a ton of words. And a picture maybe your best SEO weapon to get people to your site. (See #11 above.) If you are good with charts and PowerPoint graphics use it.
  15. Find alternative places to link and promote your writing. (LinkedIN tends to be my most successful linking site after Facebook.) And if you have good PowerPoint decks share them on Slideshare.net. You just might get new followers.
  16. Make your RSS options easy to find and universal. Feedburner used to be flakey. Since Google has bought them their services seem to have gotten more stable and more reliable. Enabling all varieties of feed and email options is a matter of setting preferences.
  17. Comment on others writing. Of course you have to read their post. And you need to add something to the conversation. If you are simply putting "Nice post" everywhere you are not really upping your social capital.
  18. Share everything. Don't hold back your expertise. If you are smart about something, if you learn something new… put it out there.
  19. Publish as soon as you get it written. If you publish fewer than 5 posts a week you might have reason to only release stuff during prime time. Or you may be justified in limiting your posts to one per day, even on a busy day. I ask, "Why?" If someone isn't interested in my picture of the 2010 Camero, perhaps they  will like my swipe at Sprint's new ad campaign that seems to be clogging up my thin-narrow pipe.
  20. Be irreverent. Have fun with what you write. Your voice will come. But if it's a boring voice you'll be done before you begin. And if you bore yourself, do you think someone else is going to promote your writing?

I hope that helps. Please add anthing I've missed in the comments.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/20-blog-tips

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


May 15 2010

What Have You Tweeted for Me Lately? *or* Burnout In Twitterville (update 5-15-10)

dropping the flock off at the tweetUpdate 5-15-10: If you don't provide value the fall will continue. That's the trend at least, after dropping nearly 1000 followees, the people continue to wake up and return the favor. But here's the good part, I don't have a plan or a program for growing my flock again. What I do have is a strategy to create tweets that are valuable for people who follow me. No tweets about TV shows or what I'm eating at the moment. Some about social media trends and ideas, some about leadership ideas, and some about my latest writing. AND if someone likes what I'm tweeting, I'm HOPING that that is how they begin following me. But of course there are a lot of strategies for building a Twitter following. One of them is just to follow as many people as possible, and hope that they follow back. I don't really subscribe to this technique. I guess it's okay if the "land grab" mentality is all that matters to you. "How many followers do YOU have?" Perhaps. But I don't think it's the REAL way to be. And again, that's merely MY opinion.

BE REAL, BE REAL-TIME, AUTO-NOTHING, CONVERSE. [tha post on this]

Update 5-13-10: Flirting above 7k followers, my UFs thins my flock. Well, this was expected.

Dropping Tweeters means dropping followers

Today I spent twenty minutes UNFOLLOWING folks. I used ManageFlitter, (looks like they had to change their name from ManageTwitter) my favorite app/site for helping you do some of the heavy lifting in Tweep management. And I think in the coming days and weeks my cleaner stream might provide more valuable information.

And here's where the return is. If I thin the heard, even my Tweetdeck tools become better at parsing out the tweets of value from the tweets of promo-mundane-eatingthis-followme-pleaseretweet-teeth whitening chatter that gives Twitter a bad name.

So unDiscovery is almost as much fun as Discovery. And ManageTwitter gives you some tools to help ID and unFollow a lot of people at once. (I can hear  you saying, "hey John, why were you following all those people anyway?" and I do have an answer for you, but let's hold off on it for second.)

First MF puts your suspect followers in several categories for easy sorting.

Sorting your tweeps with Manage Flitter

And then here's my simple process.

Processing your followers

And one of the best things you can do is BLOCK and REPORT the obvious spam accounts. Like this:

tweeters get blocked and reported

So the fun part of this is… You can rediscover some of the folks you unfollowed, as if they were new discoveries! I mean, seriously, if you miss a tweet from Chris Brogan, it's not gonna kill ya.

And then the next step is to examine what YOU have been tweeting. If you were to go back and look at your entire tweetstream, can you pick out some "best of" tweets?

We're all learning this process in our own ways. Some people like to tweet about TV shows and what food they are eating or making. That's cool, but not for me. And I'm not for everyone either. I try not to get bummed when going through the "not following you" section and learning that some of my real-life friends are no longer following me. One friend said, "I was following you for a bit, but you are insane. 90% of the time I have no idea what you are talking about. So I had to unfollow you."

(Nod.)

I get it.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/unfollowthis

Check out The Twitter Way TAB for all the Tweet-related posts.

Some related posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Apr 13 2010

The Twitter Problem: We Love This, But What Are We Going to Do For Money?

[The NYTimes today reveals that Twitter is getting ready to roll out an advertising model and a promotional tweet model to support their revenue stream. This post is a response.]

So Twitter is revealing it's killer revenue strategy and it looks a lot like an old revenue model they tried with Microsoft called ExecTweets. Oh boy! So here's the idea. According to the NYTimes article:

The advertising program, which Twitter calls Promoted Tweets, will show up when Twitter users search for keywords that the advertisers have bought to link to their ads. Later, Twitter plans to show promoted posts in the stream of Twitter posts, based on how relevant they might be to a particular user.

Several companies will run ads, including Best Buy, Virgin America, Starbucks and Bravo.

Man, I tell you what, that does not interest me in the least. I suspect it will be as successful as ExecTweets or say Facebook Ads.

So there are several problems that Twitter faces in trying to "monetize" itself. (Sounds pretty funny, to monetize oneself.)

  1. Don't kill the goose as you are trying to figure out how to get the golden eggs.
  2. Permission-based marketing is the bomb, but if you haven't been given that permission, it's not permission-based. An opt-out means you DON'T have our permission. A default opt-in does NOT give you our permission either.
  3. 80% of Twitter's traffic never hits Twitter.com. Why would we? The Twitter.com site sucks, to be blunt. If you try and use Twitter using only Twitter.com I pity your experience. The river of tweets is like a flood when you get a few active tweeters. (Yes, I'm an ACTIVE tweeter.) I suspect the next point is one of the primary reasons we don't use Twitter.com.
  4. Managing your followers and friends using Twitter.com forces you to use a slow-loading, fail whale-prone, 20-people-per-page, system. Why Twitter Why! I say this to myself, every time I have to use Twitter.com to manage my account. As tools like Tweetdeck and Seesmic and Hootsuite get better and better, the Twitter.com site becomes less and less relevant.

The main objective for Twitter: Make money. Twitter is spending a lot of money *trying* to keep the fail whale at bay. And while investments are essential, the money train won't last forever. Twitter must stabilize Twitter.com AND figure out how to make money with the beast they have created. All this "Do Only Good" crap is window dressing. They have not figured it out, and with so much money at stake, it's rather embarrassing for any of the top brass at Twitter to admit it.

It would not bode well for Twitter executives for them to say, "Well folks, we're still trying to figure it out." (Oh wait, this is exactly what they ARE or HAVE BEEN saying for a few years.) So here's the best that they have to offer? A remake of ExecuTweets! This time with Starbucks, Best Buy and others. Really Twitter?

Taking off the gloves for just a second, I'm going to give Twitter a piece of my mind. (That they neither asked for or paid for in any way, I might need to add.)

EV and Biz Stone, here's what you do. Draw the API line in the sand. If you want TWITTER FEEDS OF ANY KIND YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY TWITTER. Simple right?

Of course there will be a revolution. Many will scream and rebell. Perhaps this will be the moment where Google makes it's STATUSPHERE play. (I don't know what your sweetheart deal with Google was, but be prepared for them to eat your lunch when THEY are ready.)

But this might be the moment for you Twitter. This might be the very moment to make the BIG PLAY. And here's more of the strategy.

When the 80% of your API – data feed consumers start seeing these screens (from my Tweetdeck, yesterday):

Squeezing the Twitter API into a money stream

#twitterfail - twitter status: service not found

I tell you what would happen, as if you don't already know. The proverbial feces would hit the fan. But here's the cool part. Who is in the position of power at this point? I am talking leverage that goes well beyond telling the world you might develop or buy your own desktop app. (So what. I know you just did that.) Or you might develop or buy your own geo-location app. (So what.) But letting the entire community, and user base know, that you are about to charge for the API streams… Well, I admit that would be ballsy. It might be risking #1, the golden goose thing. But…

Here's the deal though, to make this really work, you've got to fix the fail whale problem once and for all. In the enterprise world, the user base that makes global e-commerce go around, the "Oops There's a Problem, But We're Working On It" routine does not play. It does not play at all. You know how every time G-Mail is down for like a second, the entire tech world wrings its hand and curses Google's grip on our data? Well, that's what happens every time we try and USE TWITTER for something other than CHAT. When the fail whale arrives on the scene, anyone in *business* says, "Man, these Twitter cats can't even keep their servers running, I don't think I'm ready to give them any part of my corporate communication infrastructure."

And see, this is where a company like Yammer is making HUGE inroads. The fail whale does not exist on Yammer. And guess what, their service ROCKS. We used it at Dell. And I've used it since at other companies. (I have to say I prefer an integrated internal status tool like SocialText's Signals, but Yammer will do.) And here's one more rub. People are paying to use Yammer. Of course they are. If I can run it on my servers, and OWN the data, then we have a deal.

On the other hand, if YOU Twitter sell my data as your own, if YOU Twitter can't keep the servers up during a conference like SXSW, while you profess to "Do Only Good," it's not enough.

So here's my plan for YOU Twitter: Squeeze the Twitter API into a money stream. Give everyone a few months to complain, negotiate, and seek other options and then DO IT.

No one is going to care about Promoted Tweets, or ExecTweets. I'm glad (Am I glad?) that you've found a few willing partners, paying good money (hopefully), to test flight your new revenue stream. But in the end, dear Twitter, you have only one thing that people want. And if you can't figure out how to make money on the API… Well, the goose is as good as cooked, IMFHO.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/pro-tweets

See also:

Further reflections on the quotes from the NYTimes story:

The ads will let businesses insert themselves into the stream of real-time conversation on Twitter to ensure their posts do not get buried in the flow. [PULEASE Spare Us. Didn't the mighty Microsoft plan something like this for Vista and IE, back in the day. THIS is going to piss people off. Seriously!]

“When people are searching on Starbucks, what we really want to show them is that something is happening at Starbucks right now, and Promoted Tweets will give us a chance to do that,” said Chris Bruzzo, vice president of brand, content and online at Starbucks. [Maybe they are looking for a coupon. But I think they would search "coupon" if that were the case. And maybe it will be a good idea to introduce Couponing to Twitter. MAYBE. Sure, Dell has claimed almost unbelievable numbers with their Dell Factory Outlet on Twitter program. But people were ASKING for those coupons. Please refer to the permission-based marketing item above.]

I don't know, maybe I'm being harsh here, but check out this image below. Is this how YOU see Twitter making the MILLIONS they need to make? Honestly?

Twitter's ExecTweets Money Play

And here are a few numbers to chew on for you analytically minded. Click on image to view the full-size grab. Or this link will run the analysis again.

Promoted Tweets tries again - Twitter, Facebook stats

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Mar 04 2010

Building and ReBuilding Google Buzz: At Google Beta Means Beta, Sometimes

[3-8-10: It's been 24 days since I looked in my Google Buzz folder. Gosh, I hope I'm not trending.]

So with the quick start out of the gate, Google Buzz was the darling of the media, the interactive media anyway, as soon as it appeared like a folder within our G-Mail accounts. Less than revolutionary, Buzz felt to me like yet another tool to broadcast small text bursts into the "statusphere" and [oh boy!] you could connect it to your Twitter ™ and Picassa ™ accounts. Not so revolutionary in my mind.

But for many folks it was like a chance to start fresh.

You know all those people you follow on Twitter. And all those followers you've conned over the last year or month? Well, now they are a pain. They are creating too much noise on Twitter. And the Buzz-o-fiends were praising Buzz for it's simplicity, and only adding people we "really" wanted to have our connection with.

Well, that's a problem with your account management and not the tool. Don't you think your Buzz will become just as FILLED with spammers and scammers as your Twitter stream? Or is Google going to do some spam cleansing trick and keep the creeps out?

If you believe Auto-Anything is going to save your social media stream from the MLM, teeth whitening, 1m follower scammers then you may still be a little wet behind the tweets. Perhaps you want to use something as radical as TrueTwit, the dumbass service that DMs you back letting you know your Tweet did not reach it's target and will not reach it's target until you confirm you are not a Tweetspammer. Forget that. UnFollow!

So the only "official" problem with Buzz came in the form of a privacy breach. Or perhaps a slip. Depending on how you want to position it. There were two lines of thought:

1. Google already connects, searches, records, stores and indexes everything about you, you might as well live with that idea and keep your content clean. (This is my position. On the web forget about privacy. If you think you have some, check with EFF, they will get you up to speed real quick.)

2. Oh my gosh! Google is connecting our accounts without our permission. We're all opted-IN rather than opted-OUT by default. (These were the arrows slung at Buzz and Google with some velocity soon after launch.)

What happened next was powerful and interesting.

1. Google made immediate changes to their policy. They posted the information and engaged with the conversations about privacy.

2. Google used the power of their system, ownership of the kingdom of data, and influence on just about everyone but the Chinese government to tamp down the anti-Buzz about Buzz.

Here's a chart that captures the trending discussion.

graph: Trending discussions on Google Buzz Privacy Issues

From FastCompany.com article: Infographic: How Google Quashed Privacy Concerns Over Google Buzz

So now, I've been 21 days without opening my Buzz folder. Have I missed anything important? Dont' know. Is Buzz an essential tool in my toolkit. Not exactly.

What I have done is purge a huge number of twitter followers and followees using a tool called MangeTwitter.com. And while the damage to my flock has taken place it's not where near the 1-for-1 drop I was expecting.

Makes me think of a JC Superstar song, "What's the buzz, tell me what's a happening."

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/morebuzz

A few tasty posts on buzz and tweets:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Next Page »


social media innovation group

future posts

A Collaborative Space: WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, Skype, Basecamp (Teaming/Meeting Tools)
Twitter Problem: How do you find enough interesting people to follow? Then how do you keep up with them?
The Agile Mind: Construction, Evolution, Care, and Feeding Instructions for Mental Flexibility

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogged Blog Directory

Austin Interactive Marketing Association

jmacofearth's socialmedia dashboard via AllTop

99, near perfect hubspot ranking