Quantcast


Apr 27 2009

Twitter's Global Influence Grows: Innovate, Communicate or Be Left Behind

2009 Twitter Growth - Hitwize

2009 Twitter Growth - Hitwize

Is anybody else getting bored with Twitter News?

MEGO (my eyes glaze over) these days when I hear about phenomenal twitter growth, Oprah, Demi Moore's husband the bad actor, and Britney's ghostwriter tweeting strategy. But there is no denying the power of influence that Twitter is having worldwide.

"For statistical comparison the Twitters share of visits in the US and UK, as at 21/4/2009, have grown 570.03% and 621.3% respectively since 1/01/2009 improving its ranking position 324 spots in the US and 305 spots in the UK.

"It is interesting to note that Entertainment / Celebrity brands have embraced Twitter as a communication and connection tool, yet many consumer facing brands have yet to understand the opportunity and accept the challenge of direct interaction with consumers. Props to those businesses that are active and learning." *Hitwise.

Dell certainly had a handle on embracing the Tweetwagon. And by the sheer number of folks with "atDell" in their Twitter IDs the internal team continues to work the Tweet. But what does Twitter really mean to corporate strategy? Microblogging? How do we use Twitter in the Real World to build business, establish connections and enhance brands?

If you think of Twitter as another platform to broadcast from, you are missing the main point. GET REAL in REAL TIME.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/twitter-influence

Additional Resources:

Hitwise examines Oprah's first tweet and the global impact

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Mar 30 2009

Twitter Acid Test – Discovery Beyond the Shiney Objects and Creative Avatars

Category: social media,speed the web,tech opinion,toolsjmacofearth @ 10:20 am

What are the critieria by which you choose to follow someone on Twitter?

I have several "shiney object" criteria that attract me to click the "follow" link.

  1. A unique or attactive image.
  2. A unique or creative title that expresses something I am interested in.
  3. A bio that contains humor, self-awareness and beauty.
  4. Names or Bios that include the following concepts: writer, poet, poetry, musician, songwriter, cat, dog, animal tweets, enterprise 2.0, rock n roll.
  5. An awesome post, great link, something that makes me laugh, something that awakens my senses, senseless beauty, epiphanies, spirit.
  6. A retweet by a contact that contains any of the above qualities.

And in the same way there are a number of tell tale signs that the potential tweeter is not my cup of tea.

  1. A salesly name, bio or tweet with topics such as: real estate, sales, increase your twitter followers, let me show you how, business propositions, deals, tips, company PR channels, b2b, b2c, "social media", expert, guru.
  2. An AutoBot Tweeter (AutoFollow and AutoDM after I have connected to them.) Cause if you're an Auto-Bot I don't really want to hear from you. There may be exceptions, and I don't unfollow simply by being refollowed, but you your gonna follow me back do it in person, not via an auto-responder-out-of-office-automaton message. I don't care how personal or happy you try to make the message, it comes across as fake. However, one word, that shows you actually looked at my profile, "nice bio" or "songwriter, eh?" is enough to make me smile. And that's what all this is about, the smile.
  3. Forgetting the smile. All business and no fun makes for unfollowed tweeps.

There was an article about happy people hanging around other happy people. And how happy folks actually attract more happy folks. And being with someone who is happy can actually make you feel better yourself. And happiness is a lot of what we are here to BE. I am all about happy. If something you tweet makes me smile, giggle, or just feel a warm fuzzy, then I'm IN.

So the discovery of new Twitter people is fun and addictive. Just as finding new friends on Facebook can keep you up late at night, Twitter "following" is no different. But when your "following" count goes above 1,000 tweeps, how do you manage?

I tell you, my criteria gets pretty honed when I am reviewing the people I follow for dead wood. I use several tools.

But the basic task is flipping back through pages (20 tweeps per screen) and unfollowing the uninspired. And for that quick list the criteria becomes much simpler. So the Occam's Razor of Twitter unfollows is this.

Does the Tweeter Follow Me?

  • IF NO. Do I recognize the tweeter? If not, they have probably not made any tweets that stick in my memory.
    • IF YES: Skip to next Tweeter.
    • IF NO: Do I still recognize my initial interest in following the Tweeter?
      • IF NO: UNFOLLOW.
      • IF YES: Keep and skip to next Tweeter.
  • IF YES. Do I recognize the Tweeter?
    • IF YES: Have they made any memorable tweets?
      • IF YES: Keep and skip to next Tweeter.
    • IF NO. Do I still recognize my initial interest in following the Tweeter?
      • IF NO: UNFOLLOW.
      • IF YES: Keep and skip to next Tweeter.

And to review, here is the Twitter Formula:

TS = FUD (Twitter Satisfaction = Following good tweeps, Unfollowing shallow tweeps, Discovering new tweeps)

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/twitter-management

+++

Related Posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,




social media innovation group

future posts

A Collaborative Space: WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, Skype, Basecamp (Teaming/Meeting Tools)
Twitter Problem: How do you find enough interesting people to follow? Then how do you keep up with them?
The Agile Mind: Construction, Evolution, Care, and Feeding Instructions for Mental Flexibility

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogged Blog Directory

Austin Interactive Marketing Association

jmacofearth's socialmedia dashboard via AllTop

99, near perfect hubspot ranking