Quantcast


Aug 24 2009

Culling the Spammers from My Twitter Followers: TwitBlock.org Rocks!

Screen shot 2009-08-24 at 3.55.45 PM

Days later the trend continues.

Screen shot 2009-08-26 at 3.04.53 PM

I think I'm beginning to like this. Deleting spammy followers hurts my following, but once you get the hang of it, it really is fun knocking off the quote-spammers, the check-me-out-online spammers, the SEO-spammers. Heck, I think my spammer count has gone UP because I keep mentioning spam, spam, spam, spam, wonderful spam, wonderful spam. My count above, Added since yesterday: -1. Average growth per day: -20. Oh my. I was so close to 7,100! And for what? I may sink forever in a torrent of spammy tweeters. Oh whoa is me and my flock.

From a high of 7,093 I have aggressively BLOCKED spammy followers using TwitBlock.org, my new favorite tool. [I'm not sure how I got spam listed by 9 twitblock users, but I have some suspicions. Oh well. If you're in the neighborhood and would like to "whitelist me" as not spam I'd appreciate it.]

Well, my aggressive unspam blocking has resulted in a drop in my follower count to 6,870. Seems like the Tweespammers are aggressive about unfollowing unfollowers. I say if you're gonna blast crap quote spam, MLM marketing messages and sexcam solicitations I think you should be blocked. Perhaps those folks can figure out who blocked them and block back?

Screen shot 2009-08-24 at 4.20.56 PM

No worries. Seems like the value of a tweet just got a little more easy to spot with Twitblocker. Two great things about this tool.

1. It shows all your spammy followers on one screen allowing your to unfollow a lot of people at once. And the spammers are easy to spot, believe me. Especially when they are all lined up together like a police lineup.

2. As the tool gets more users and more accounts are rated as spam, the ratings will get better and the tool will be better at pulling spammers out of your flow.

Here's a sample output as TwitBlock began scanning my followers:

Screen shot 2009-08-24 at 4.41.10 PM

You can see I have not blocked sxpanel, but I am about to block Schwartz632. It's easy to spot the spammers, but TwitBlock makes it really easy to find them all in one place.

What we need perhaps is a kick ass Tweeter list. I've been wanting to build a matrix of folks I follow in different fields. Like a verification or a seal of approval for some folks I think are awesome. Starting with my very few #FF #followfriday nominations and Mr. Tweet recommendations, I'm sure I could produce a shortlist of recommendations. That will be my next task.

In the mean time keep it clean and add your account to Twitblock.org and get blocking. The twittersphere will thank you and together we can reduce the noise.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/twitblock-inaction

NOTE: If you think I'm spammy please let me know. I'd be happy to understand how I can provide more value for you. My motto is WIIFY (what's in it for you). And an ON NO: In unfollowing so many peeps I just upset my follow/follower ratio and I can follow no more people. Gotta get out the wackin tool again. ARRRGGH!

See also The Twitter Way, the collected posts about Twitter and Doing Twitter Right

A funny post from Mashable on the Top 25 most spammy Twitter Avatar images.

Latest Twitter Posts

My favorite twittertools:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Aug 10 2009

Bored Tweetless: When Twitter Is Not About Conversations

Category: social mediajmacofearth @ 6:36 am

Maybe it's my problem. Maybe my use of Twitter has grown stale. Maybe the downtime Twitter had on Thursday was a good thing for everyone.

Is it just me or is Twitter getting boring?

I mean, I have my Tweetdeck. And I have my filters. And I spend my time squashing the pornsters, quotaholics, follow-me, seo, teeth-whitening followers with abandon. But something is not coming back with all the time and effort I'm putting in.

So the followers are up. (Thank you very much, I hope that I continue to provide tweets of value.) And I am still as committed as ever to providing educational and funny tidbits. But more and more I am finding opening my Tweetdeck for a bit'o'Twitter is less and less rewarding.

A couple conversations I had this week have started me thinking about Twitter a little differently.

1. I met with a potential client who wanted to jump start their local business with "social media." During part of our discussion she said, "A couple people have said they would do my Twitter for me." I lit up a bit. "I think that's the wrong use of Twitter. Lot's of people are using Twitter for everything, but not every business needs a Twitter strategy. I guess you could do the Dell thing and use Twitter as an RSS feed pumping out the "deals" via Twitter and calling it a social media success. And yes Dell is nearing a million followers, but what are those people looking for? They are not listening to a voice or a personality. They are subscribed to a coupon network. I guess that's cool if that's what you're into. But I don't think that's a valid strategy for most businesses."

2. The second conversation was with a friend who is not sure about Twitter at all. "So why do so many people subscribe to your Twitter?" he asked as we talked about what I've been working on. I told him about my Twitter rants and how I've been self-evaluating and trying to do a better job. Actually working to add value to with my Tweets. "And of course I use it to promote some of my writings. I can't tell you how cool it is to tweet about something I've just written and watch the incoming traffic going to my blog and reading the post. Man, self-publishing in the old days wasn't this cool. Talk about instant feedback!"

Okay, so as an individual Twitter is about authenticity and voice. If all you are doing is talking about "what are you doing?" as in, "going to get a diet coke" and "heading to lunch with friends" then the quality of your tweetstream is fairly low. But if you think about adding value, if you imagine your followers as potential friends and readers not marketing targets then there is a lot you can do with a shiny new Twitter ID. But it's not for everyone.

So how can I get re-energized about Twitter? What is missing? In trying to figure out who to feature as my ONE #FollowFriday post it was hard to think of more than a handful of tweeters that actually enlighten and surprise me on a regular basis. There is an art to the short form. And often I will RT (ReTweet) any posts that I think are awesome. The funniest was Friday night.

"Hi my name is Bill and I'm an OVERTWEETER. (where's the donuts?)"

I seriously couldn't stop laughing after that one. So I retweeted and started a funny conversation with the author.

And do you notice that at different times of day there are different type of Twitter conversations going on. I find that late at night the conversations actually start happening. Almost like IM conversations. People exchanging a lot more than during the day. It's almost like a in club. Check it out, after 10 pm on weekdays. And around midnight the hard core social media folks are still on. And you can strike up some amazing conversations via Twitter.

I guess that's what I'm missing is conversations. Most of Twitter these days seems to be blasting messages. I really hate it when a friend starts hyping some product or some new conference or service. It's not like the companies don't have enough options to message me.

So I'll see what I can do to get more conversational on Twitter. And of course I'll keep writing the posts and working on the Twitter books. You do the same.

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/bored-tweetless

Check out The Twitter Way for all Twitter philosophy you care to eat.

NYTimes has a new post about Paid-to-Tweet issues: Tweeting for Dollars

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Mar 30 2009

Twitter Acid Test – Discovery Beyond the Shiney Objects and Creative Avatars

Category: social media,speed the web,tech opinion,toolsjmacofearth @ 10:20 am

What are the critieria by which you choose to follow someone on Twitter?

I have several "shiney object" criteria that attract me to click the "follow" link.

  1. A unique or attactive image.
  2. A unique or creative title that expresses something I am interested in.
  3. A bio that contains humor, self-awareness and beauty.
  4. Names or Bios that include the following concepts: writer, poet, poetry, musician, songwriter, cat, dog, animal tweets, enterprise 2.0, rock n roll.
  5. An awesome post, great link, something that makes me laugh, something that awakens my senses, senseless beauty, epiphanies, spirit.
  6. A retweet by a contact that contains any of the above qualities.

And in the same way there are a number of tell tale signs that the potential tweeter is not my cup of tea.

  1. A salesly name, bio or tweet with topics such as: real estate, sales, increase your twitter followers, let me show you how, business propositions, deals, tips, company PR channels, b2b, b2c, "social media", expert, guru.
  2. An AutoBot Tweeter (AutoFollow and AutoDM after I have connected to them.) Cause if you're an Auto-Bot I don't really want to hear from you. There may be exceptions, and I don't unfollow simply by being refollowed, but you your gonna follow me back do it in person, not via an auto-responder-out-of-office-automaton message. I don't care how personal or happy you try to make the message, it comes across as fake. However, one word, that shows you actually looked at my profile, "nice bio" or "songwriter, eh?" is enough to make me smile. And that's what all this is about, the smile.
  3. Forgetting the smile. All business and no fun makes for unfollowed tweeps.

There was an article about happy people hanging around other happy people. And how happy folks actually attract more happy folks. And being with someone who is happy can actually make you feel better yourself. And happiness is a lot of what we are here to BE. I am all about happy. If something you tweet makes me smile, giggle, or just feel a warm fuzzy, then I'm IN.

So the discovery of new Twitter people is fun and addictive. Just as finding new friends on Facebook can keep you up late at night, Twitter "following" is no different. But when your "following" count goes above 1,000 tweeps, how do you manage?

I tell you, my criteria gets pretty honed when I am reviewing the people I follow for dead wood. I use several tools.

But the basic task is flipping back through pages (20 tweeps per screen) and unfollowing the uninspired. And for that quick list the criteria becomes much simpler. So the Occam's Razor of Twitter unfollows is this.

Does the Tweeter Follow Me?

  • IF NO. Do I recognize the tweeter? If not, they have probably not made any tweets that stick in my memory.
    • IF YES: Skip to next Tweeter.
    • IF NO: Do I still recognize my initial interest in following the Tweeter?
      • IF NO: UNFOLLOW.
      • IF YES: Keep and skip to next Tweeter.
  • IF YES. Do I recognize the Tweeter?
    • IF YES: Have they made any memorable tweets?
      • IF YES: Keep and skip to next Tweeter.
    • IF NO. Do I still recognize my initial interest in following the Tweeter?
      • IF NO: UNFOLLOW.
      • IF YES: Keep and skip to next Tweeter.

And to review, here is the Twitter Formula:

TS = FUD (Twitter Satisfaction = Following good tweeps, Unfollowing shallow tweeps, Discovering new tweeps)

@jmacofearth
permalink: http://bit.ly/twitter-management

+++

Related Posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,




social media innovation group

future posts

A Collaborative Space: WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, Skype, Basecamp (Teaming/Meeting Tools)
Twitter Problem: How do you find enough interesting people to follow? Then how do you keep up with them?
The Agile Mind: Construction, Evolution, Care, and Feeding Instructions for Mental Flexibility

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogged Blog Directory

Austin Interactive Marketing Association

jmacofearth's socialmedia dashboard via AllTop

99, near perfect hubspot ranking